<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobilitysite - Latest Comments in SanDisk Releasing X4 SDHC Cards</title><link>http://mobilitysite.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mobilitysite.disqus.com/sandisk_releasing_x4_sdhc_cards_91/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:32:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SanDisk Releasing X4 SDHC Cards</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/sandisk-releasing-x4-sdhc-cards-2/#comment-19992436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the architecture for &amp;gt; 32 GB cards was going to be &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#SDXC" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#SDXC"&gt;Secure Digital Extended Capacity&lt;/a&gt; (SDXC).  Sure, SDHC's cap of 32 GB is artificial (as explained in the link above), but will today's SDHC-compatible devices work with 64 GB SDHC cards?  If not, why not just use SDXC?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pony99CA</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>