<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobilitysite - Latest Comments in Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://mobilitysite.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mobilitysite.disqus.com/droid_comes_through_in_the_nick_of_time/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:31:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21700557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As iPhone people would say, "There's an app for that."  Get Opera 9.5 (or 9.7) or SkyFire, for example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, as I've pointed out numerous times before, it was probably the first mobile OS to include a "real" (HTML, not WAP) browser at all.  So I think WM still gets props for &lt;b&gt;having&lt;/b&gt; a browser long before Android (or the iPhone) came out.  It just didn't get the improvements it should have.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Out of curiosity, how does the Android (or iPhone, for that matter) browser do on Flash-heavy sites?  For example, &lt;a href="http://cafe-ella.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://cafe-ella.com"&gt;http://cafe-ella.com&lt;/a&gt; (a local restaurant).  If a browser can't display Flash sites (even though Flash sites kind of suck), is it really a "great" browser?  Very good, perhaps, but not great.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pony99CA</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21494579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, that "almost everything" does not include a great built-in web browser. And still doesn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21211477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, remember that almost everything "Droid Does", "Windows Mobile Did" a year or more ago.  :D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Multitasking?  Check.&lt;br&gt;GPS?  Check.&lt;br&gt;Real QWERTY keyboards.  Check, check, check....&lt;br&gt;5 MP camera?  Check.&lt;br&gt;Customization?  Check.&lt;br&gt;Replaceable battery?  Check.&lt;br&gt;E-mail, contacts, games?  Please.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Droid does look cool, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pony99CA</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:21:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21210894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope that photo wasn't taken using the Droid's camera.  :D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I guess Motorola must be hurting if they couldn't spring for some hot bikini models (or swimsuit hunks for our female readers).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pony99CA</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21210777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not that you can really compare frequencies across processor types, but what about the 1 GHz Snapdragon phones?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pony99CA</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21180366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would think that the separate GPU would effectively add 200-300 Mhz to the CPU. That would make this the fastest phone processor on the market, I believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Waldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21179515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BGR says it is running a 550MHz Texas Instruments OMAP3430 processor with a separate PowerVR GPU.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zealot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:06:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Droid Comes Through in the Nick of Time!</title><link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/10/droid-comes-through-in-the-nick-of-time/#comment-21178907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did they mention which processor was in the device?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Waldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>